n
the essay below, Dr. Carlos F. Barbas discusses his highly
cited work on proteins and gene expression. According to the ISI
Essential
Science Indicators
Web product, Dr. Barbas ranks in the top 1% in terms of total
citations in the fields of Chemistry (64 papers cited a total
of 2,103 times to date), Microbiology (11 papers cited a total
of 1,093 times to date), and Biology & Biochemistry (28
papers cited 851 times to date). Dr. Barbas is the Kellogg
Chair in Molecular Biology at the Skaggs Institute for
Chemical Biology and the Departments of Molecular Biology and
Chemistry, which is part of the Scripps Research Institute in
La Jolla, California.
|
I have had an interest in alchemy for
some time now, and since I have this rare opportunity to engage in a
creative writing exercise, I thought I would place our studies and my
own scientific motivations within an alchemical context. In a
nutshell, an alchemical transformation can be divided into three
parts: the negredo, the albedo, and the rubedo. As I will use the
terms here, the negredo consists of understanding the fundamental laws
of nature through experimentation, and the albedo involves the
marriage of principles elucidated in the negredo into a new form of
understanding of nature that might include an invention, or
therapeutic hypothesis and means of testing. We all have our albedos.
In an age where the author line may consist of more than 100 names,
remember that we all have our albedos and thank god they are not all
the same. I like to think that all scientists practice their own
personal alchemy.
|

“Like the ancient alchemists who attempted again and again to transmute base metal into gold, we seek to develop new therapies, hopefully with a much greater success rate.”
|
|
Rubedo is the transcendence, the final achievement of the goal. As
an organic chemist and molecular biologist, my rubedo crystallizes in
the purity of a cure: a cure for a disease. A rubedo envisioned since
I was a child. My course has not been direct, but has taken a number
of turns. Sometimes we are distracted. Serendipity has stepped in on
occasion and directed me to my path. The path to a rubedo may be long,
it may be endless. I may never reach it, but a cure for a disease is
the goal of my quest nonetheless. In order to create drugs, I became
an organic chemist and then became a molecular biologist.
Over the years this quest has led my colleagues and me to a few
albedos and we have been highly cited in the literature. We
demonstrated that proteins as large and complex as antibody Fab
fragments (50kD heterodimers) could be displayed on the surface of
phage at a time when it was believed that the phage-display approach
would be limited to peptides or cDNA fragments. Fab fragments are the
portions of antibodies that bind antigen. We created the first human
antibody Fab fragment libraries on phage, allowing us to rapidly
isolate human monoclonal antibodies directly from humans and
subsequently create the first synthetic human antibodies directly.
These methodologies and the pComb3 vector system now facilitate the
development of antibody therapeutics in laboratories around the world.
I adapted this approach to evolve in vitro the activity of a
unique anti-HIV antibody. I had the pleasure of isolating this
antibody, IgG1-b12, with my own hands. The evolved progeny of IgG1-b12
show improved anti-viral potency and may soon be tested in patients as
immunotoxins aimed at eliminating HIV-1 infected cells. The affinity
maturation of antibodies can now be readily performed using the
methodologies we have established as we probed the chemistry of the
antibody binding-site. We hope that the large number of anti-HIV
antibodies that we have described will also aid in the development of
an HIV vaccine. I also isolated a human antibody known as RSV-19, with
the hope of treating respiratory syncitial virus-induced pneumonia, a
disease that kills more then a million children every year. A
CDR-grafted anti-RSV antibody beat our RSV-19 into clinical
development, but our human antibody may one day be tested in patients.
I can’t refer to the singular "I" when I discuss the
work of my laboratory any longer, since I now live through the
experimental hands of my colleagues. I enjoy it just the same, but it
is not as simple as performing experiments with your own hands.
Recently, we developed a novel antibody against the colon antigen A33.
This antibody is now in clinical development for the treatment of
colon cancer. We have also studied methods of expressing antibodies in
cells and engineering novel forms of antibodies. We have demonstrated
that such antibodies can inhibit HIV entry while others can inhibit
the growth of tumors. We have also shown that peptide ligands can be
grafted into the CDR’s of antibodies to create ligand-mimetic
antibodies that display numerous advantages over the starting peptide
ligand. Like the ancient alchemists who attempted again and again to
transmute base metal into gold, we seek to develop new therapies,
hopefully with a much greater success rate. Along the way, we learn
the secrets of biology, the negredo, and refine our approaches to
therapeutics in the albedo.
Sometimes a scientist can find results that are so compelling in
their potential to have an impact on disease that a moral imperative
results. The moral imperative, an albedo in its own right, requires
the scientist to push the idea to maturity either through finding a
partner to develop the drug or technology or by founding a company
themselves. In an attempt to facilitate the translation of our
phage-display antibody studies into clinical reality, I co-founded a
biotechnology company named Prolifaron, Inc., now known as Alexion
Antibody Technology. The quest for clinical success with
antibody-based therapeutics continues today.
Not content with examining a single approach to my envisioned
rubedo, in the early 1990’s I developed a research course aimed at
reaching into genomes to turn genes on or off using proteins. The
hypothesis here is that we have within our genomes the cures to many
diseases. If we can learn to orchestrate gene expression, we may be
able to treat disease. If we can control the genomes of viruses, we
can control the fate of the virus as well. My colleagues and I have
learned to create proteins that could be shaped to bind virtually any
DNA sequence. We also achieved, for the first time, the directed
regulation of endogenous human and plant genes. Polydactyl zinc finger
transcription factors, the approach we envisioned, actually worked. Of
course, it had to. Nature had shown us the way and we found the path.
Endogenous genes can now be turned on or up or off or down using our
zinc finger transcription factor technology. The negredo of this study
was learning how these proteins recognize DNA specifically and how we
might best place them in the genome to control genes. We have also
designed novel approaches that allow our designed transcription
factors to be regulated by small molecules. Significantly, we were the
first to patent this approach to control genes, a process that
actually facilitates drug development rather than hindering it. The
first entry of this technology into the clinic is due at the end of
2004, led by a biotechnology company that licensed our patents in this
area. My laboratory moved from the basic study of protein-DNA
interactions and transcription to an attempt at having an impact on
human disease. That is how I like to envision research projects:
learning nature’s secrets, and hoping to use them to treat disease.
My colleagues and I created a unique class of catalytic antibodies
known as aldolase antibodies. By recreating proteins with the
functions of natural enzymes we have teased out some of the secrets of
nature’s methods of catalysis. With these antibodies we have
prepared, in chiral form, a large number of synthons that may one day
be pieced into a drug that sits on a shelf in a pharmacy. That’s the
dream, a vision of a rubedo. We have also crafted a suite of
anti-cancer drugs that can be selectively activated by these special
antibodies and we have shown in animal models of cancer that we can
effectively treat cancer with them. We aim to create a new approach to
chemotherapy that is more effective and less limited by side effects.
We continue today to further refine this approach, and perhaps one day
will develop an effective prodrug therapy for cancer and HIV-1.
Drawing our catalytic antibody studies together with our knowledge
of drug design and its inherent limitations, we have recently created
a new class of therapeutic molecules called chemically programmed
antibodies. Chemically programmed antibodies build on the chemistry of
aldolase antibodies and their intrinsic activity with beta-diketones.
We have demonstrated that by finding permissible sites on drugs for
attachment of a beta-diketone linker, we can simply and
site-specifically label the active sites of catalytic antibodies with
receptor-binding drugs. The antibody is then effectively reprogrammed
to bind the receptor that the original drug bound. Through this
linkage, the antibody brings to the drug the antibody’s favorable
characteristics of a long and predictable half-life in the body,
valency that effectively boosts binding, and ability to interact with
the immune system through the constant region of the antibody. Thus
antibody effector functions like antibody dependent cellular
cytotoxicity (ADCC) are added to the intrinsic activity of the drug.
We have demonstrated in multiple models of cancer that we can take a
poorly active drug and boost its activity using this approach to
achieve impressive therapeutic results in preclinical studies. The
promise of this approach created a moral imperative that led me to
found my second biotechnology company, known as CovX Pharmaceuticals,
to develop this approach into the rubedo I envision.
Our studies in catalytic antibodies and our attempts to learn
nature’s secrets to catalyzing chemical reactions has led not only
to the creation of the most highly efficient class of antibody
catalysts known but also to the rediscovery and rebirth of a
fundamental area of chemistry known as organocatalysis. We approach
the problem of catalytic asymmetric synthesis by attempting to unveil
the strategies that nature has hidden over the millennia in the form
of enzymes. I believe the synthesis of stereochemically complex
molecules is a rather simple feat. We simply don’t know enough
chemistry yet to carry out stereochemically challenging syntheses in a
straightforward fashion. Since asymmetric synthesis has led the
pharmaceutical industry to many successful drugs, we need to know how
to achieve this feat more effectively, how to make such molecules
efficiently and in a diversity sufficient to allow us to find more
drugs.
We have sprung from salty ponds of molecules, somehow organizing
ourselves from rather simple starting materials to a point where we
actually act, dream, and create. My assumption is that we are
molecules in a sack, born under simple conditions. By learning from
nature and drawing on the negredo of our antibody studies, we have
created highly efficient catalytic asymmetric variants of the aldol,
Mannich, Michael, Diels-Alder, and a wide variety of assembly
reactions. By studying how nature’s complex aldolase enzymes
catalyze reactions, we were able to recapitulate many features of this
class of large protein catalysts with the simple amino acid L-proline.
Using L-proline we have developed a number of practical
enantioselective reactions. Who could have imagined that an amino acid
as simple as L-proline and its derivatives might be such fantastic
catalysts for so many asymmetric reactions? Aldehydes can now be
directly and readily harnessed by chemists to act as efficient
nucleophiles. Amino acids, amines, and simple reactions conditions now
make it possible. Asymmetric molecules that once required many
chemical steps to synthesize can now be created using a very simple
and environmentally sound chemistry. By facilitating the synthesis of
asymmetric molecules we hope that we are providing others with the
building blocks for their own rubedo of new drugs.
I want to close this dialogue with a brief tribute to those who
have served as my mentors over the years. Alchemy, of course, is
passed on by a master to an apprentice. As an undergraduate I majored
in both chemistry and physics, a path that arose due to great teachers
in both areas. Great teachers and mentors can have a tremendous impact
on a student. As an undergraduate, my mentors were Wayne Guida in
chemistry and Harry Ellis in physics. These two men led me to
complicate my life a bit more with a double major. My road to graduate
studies was ahead of me but its path was not set. On one fateful trip
to a graduate school interview, the police intervened and ticketed my
roommate and me on the way to the airport causing me to miss my
flight. That was actually a great traffic ticket. When I finally
arrived, most of the faculty members I had requested to meet with were
unavailable. I was given an interview schedule with names and areas of
research that were unfamiliar to me. One of those individuals would
pick up where Guida and Ellis left off. My next "master" was
Chi-Huey Wong. Under Chi-Huey I began to mix synthetic chemistry with
molecular biology and a whole new horizon opened for me. I received my
Ph.D. in 1989 and moved to The Scripps Research Institute. At Scripps,
Richard Lerner became my mentor and instilled in me his drive for
fearless exploration of diverse areas of science and medicine.
Following my postdoctoral studies with him, I remained at Scripps and
was promoted to Assistant Professor in 1991. Now as a Full Professor I
am no less hungry for discovery and my quest for the rubedo continues.
Of course I must credit all of my achievements to the collective
wisdom and efforts of my mentors and the students, postdoctoral
fellows, and technicians that have joined me on this quest over the
years.
The end of science? Bully!
Carlos F. Barbas III, Ph.D.
The Scripps Research Institute
La Jolla, CA, USA
|