n
a recent analysis of
Essential Science Indicators ,
the journal Violence Against Women (VAW) was named a Rising
Star in the field of Social Sciences, for having the
highest percent increase in total citations for the third
bimonthly period of 2006. The journal’s current record in
this field includes 335 papers with a total of 858 cites. VAW
is an international, peer-reviewed monthly journal published
since March 1995 by Sage Publications. In the interview below,
in-cites talks with the Editor, Claire Renzetti, about VAW’s
history and citation achievements.
|
Did you expect Violence Against
Women (VAW) to become highly cited, or is this surprising to you?
I had an inkling that VAW would become highly cited when,
within just two years of publishing the journal, Sage made the
decision to increase the volume size from four to six issues. That
was in 1997. By the fifth year, it was decided that the demand was
strong enough to publish monthly. Submissions were high, but the
acceptance rate has hovered at about 12% for the past seven or eight
years. It was really the subscriptions and the interest in the
journal that prompted increasing publication. So while I am somewhat
surprised—and pleasantly so—that VAW has become so highly
cited relatively quickly, the signs of its success were there early
on.
How would you account for the increased citation rate of Violence
Against Women?
|

“VAW provides an outlet for high-quality social science research on a persistent and very troubling social problem.”
|
|
The increase is likely due to two factors: the characteristics of
the journal and the characteristics of the field. First, VAW
is the only journal published that focuses entirely on the problem
of violence against women. Other journals in the social sciences and
health include articles—some more than others—on issues related
to violence against women, but VAW is the only professional
journal exclusively devoted to the topic. Moreover, VAW is
international and interdisciplinary in scope. So researchers
throughout the world and in diverse disciplines—e.g., sociology,
criminology, social work, psychology, anthropology, political
science, public health, nursing—publish in and use VAW as a
resource.
At the same time, the field itself has grown exponentially in a
relatively short period of time. More research is being done on the
problem of violence against women than ever before, and funding for
that research is available from a variety of sources, such as the
United Nations Development Fund for Women (UNIFEM), the National
Institute of Justice (NIJ), and the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC). For example, funding from NIJ under the auspices
of the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) has produced many landmark
studies that are now being written up and submitted to journals,
including VAW. I think you’ll also find in the last 10-15
years a tremendous increase in the number of doctoral dissertations
in various disciplines that are addressing some dimension of the
problems of violence against women.
Was there a change in policy or editorial direction that might account
for this?
The only editorial change that I think may have significantly
affected the citation rate was one I mentioned previously: the
change to monthly publication in 1999. This has allowed us to get
more cutting-edge research into print more quickly than when we were
publishing only four or six issues a year. It also allows us to
publish two or three special issues per volume that highlight
particularly important or controversial topics, such as violence
against women in the military, women’s use of violence in intimate
relationships, and violence against marginalized groups of women,
such as immigrant and refugee women.
What, in your view, is this journal’s main significance or
contribution in the field of Social Sciences?
VAW provides an outlet
for high-quality social science research on a persistent and very
troubling social problem. The international nature of the journal
means that researchers throughout the world can share their findings
with colleagues working on the same or similar aspects of the problem
in other countries. In other words, VAW promotes cross-cultural
dialogue and, hopefully, collaboration. And the interdisciplinary
nature of the journal fosters dialogue across disciplinary boundaries.
It promotes cross-talk among researchers in diverse fields who are
working on similar issues, but who are not likely to attend the same
conferences or professional workshops. I am often struck by the
similarities in work being done by researchers in very different
fields, and it is exciting if the journal can bring them together so
they can build on one another’s research. This kind of
collaboration, I think, holds tremendous promise for advancing our
understanding of the problem of violence against women and
contributing to the development of effective strategies to address it.
How do you see your field evolving in the next few years?
The research is becoming more nuanced. For instance, research is
showing that race and ethnicity as well as social class are related
to differences in perpetration and victimization experiences, which,
in turn, tells us that we need to address these differences in our
prevention and intervention efforts. One size does not fit all. I
think we will see further nuance or refinement in our research
questions on all aspects of violence against women as the field
continues to grow and mature.
What role do you see for your journal?
Essentially, Violence Against Women is a forum for
international and interdisciplinary research that can be applied
in professional, clinical, and advocacy settings. VAW
publishes highly useable knowledge that has the potential to enhance
safety and quality of life, especially for women.
Violence Against Women
Claire Renzetti, Editor
Sage Publications, publishers
| Violence Against Women's
most-cited paper with 38 cites to date: |
|
Tolman RM and Rosen D, "Domestic violence in the lives of women receiving welfare—mental health, substance dependence, and economic well-being,"
Violence Against Women 7(2): 141-58, February 2001. |
|
Source:
Essential Science Indicators |
|
|