Beginning in mid-February 2008, the 1997-2007 online version of the Science Watch® newsletter, ESI-Topics.com, and in-cites.com, will all be featured together on the redesigned ScienceWatch.com. All previous content from the three sites will be permanently archived, and remain accessible from any existing bookmarks to the archived pages. No new content will be added to this site. Updates and new content (updated biweekly) are available at ScienceWatch.com now.
The Thomson Corporation inin-cites logoites
ScientistsPapersInstitutionsJournalsCountriesH O M ERSS feeds


S E A R C H
incites



JOURNALS

Scientists
Papers
Institutions
Journals
Countries
 

The Top 10...
Analysis of...
Site Map by Fields
Overview Menu of all Interviews
Podcasts
Hot Papers published within the last 2 years
Current Classics
SCI-BYTES - What's New in Research
What's New in Research

in-cites, April 2006
Citing URL: http://www.in-cites.com/journals/FunctionalPlantBiology.html

Journals

             
Functional Plant Biology
           

According to a recent analysis of Essential Science Indicators, Functional Plant Biology has achieved the highest percent increase in total citations among journals in the field of Plant & Animal Science. The journal’s current record in this field includes 471 papers cited a total of 1,822 times to date. In the interview below, Functional Plant Biology’s Managing Editor, Dr. Jennifer Henry, talks about the journal’s history and citation achievements.

in-cites  Did you expect Functional Plant Biology to become highly cited, or is this surprising to you?

This is welcome news, and a long-hoped-for part of our overall vision! Although citations are not our primary goal, they are crucial for survival in today’s marketplace, where journal usage governs which libraries maintain their subscription. Higher citations are a by-product of our main goal (publishing exceptional science). This is pleasing when authors have a choice of so many journals for submission.

in-cites  How would you account for the increased citation rate of Functional Plant Biology?


“The upswing in the amount of molecular work in plant science research has helped lift our impact factor, as much of it increases our understanding of plant function, and so is a great fit with our scope, and tends to be cited reasonably fast.”

By way of background, we relaunched the journal in 2002 (from the Australian Journal of Plant Physiology), partly to move away from the misperception that this is "an Australian journal," and partly to reflect our realigned focus. Plant science research in this century is much broader that just "plant physiology" (which conjures up images of bearded men measuring leaf length with a ruler!), and now encompasses molecular biology, tissue culture, and gene discovery. The focus of AjPP, and main criterion for accepting papers, was always how the research increases our understanding of plant function, so we decided to embody this in the new title of the journal.

Around the time of the relaunch, we focused on attracting the best science we could, through increased promotional efforts to attract higher-quality submissions from a wide range of countries, and by guidelines to our reviewers to be more critical. We also encouraged top authors who usually published elsewhere to give us a go. Those combined efforts have resulted in more and better manuscripts coming our way, so consequently the citation rate has risen.

in-cites  Was there a change in policy or editorial direction that might account for this?

We acknowledged early on that we couldn’t necessarily compete with "mega-publishers" or much larger journals (without a massive impact factor or, being a not-for-profit publisher, a large budget). I recognized that one thing we could offer was a "boutique service," which is the beauty of the journal having a full-time in-house scientifically trained Managing Editor (rather than an academic Editor-in-Chief whose time is split wearing several hats). I work hard to offer rapid turnaround (within five weeks) and friendly, personalised service (particularly when rejecting a manuscript). The upside (for authors) of our stringent budget is that there are no page charges in FPB, and (for subscribers) the fact that our subscription price is relatively low.

The journal committee and I remain open-minded to considering left-field viewpoint articles that may not be in the scope of (or considered by) more conservative journals. We have expanded our scope to include methodological papers, which feature on our "Most Read Papers" list (such as Jodie Dunn’s "Comparison of solvent regimes for the extraction of photosynthetic pigments from leaves of higher plants"1) and we invite review articles from top authors in the field (such as Manuela Chaves’ "Understanding plant responses to drought - from genes to the whole plant"). See related link #1 below.

in-cites  What historical factors have contributed to the success of Functional Plant Biology?

Australia has long had a strong plant physiology research community with excellent links with major international players. Since its inception in 1974, AjPP has been well respected and supported by many key plant physiologists in the ‘70s and ‘80s. That support continues through close links with the Australian Society of Plant Scientists and the New Zealand Society of Plant Physiologists, for whom we sponsor several awards for early-career researchers. We are supported by a progressive publishing house (CSIRO PUBLISHING), which strives to stay at the forefront of publishing technology, so we stay abreast with online submission, fast Web publishing, and international market penetration.

in-cites  Have there been specific developments in the fields served by Functional Plant Biology that may have contributed?

The upswing in the amount of molecular work in plant science research has helped lift our impact factor, as much of it increases our understanding of plant function, and so is a great fit with our scope, and tends to be cited reasonably fast. I don’t dare to claim that we have brought about any great change in the direction of research, but I do hope that we have facilitated discussion through exposure of people’s research, particularly in more niche areas such as CAM and ecophysiology, through our regularly publishing Special Issues on these topics, particularly from conferences.

in-cites  What, in your view, is this journal’s main significance or contribution in the field of Plant & Animal Science?

We focus on high-quality biochemical, physiological, and molecular studies of plant function, and, as mentioned earlier, remain open-minded to a range of viewpoints. We also support early-career researchers (less than 10 years post-Ph.D.) by awarding the "FPB Best Paper" prize and sponsoring the Peter Goldacre award each year. Many past winners of the Goldacre are now big names in plant physiology (Barry Osmond, Andrew Smith, Graham Farquhar, Joe Wolfe, Geoff McFadden, and Harvey Millar). Since 2005, we offer Rapid Communication for work that is particularly exciting and should be published fast (such as Stan Roberts’ "Metabolic engineering of Arabidopsis to produce nutritionally important DHA in seed oil"2). See related link #2 below.

in-cites  How do you see your field(s) evolving in the next few years?

I have already seen really exciting research coming out of inter-faculty tearoom discussions! There is great potential for discoveries through increased collaboration across disciplines (e.g. biomedical + plant science, physics + cell biology).

in-cites  What role do you see for your journal?

All journals offer the value-adding service of peer-review, and I believe that these reviewers are the lifeblood of any journal, and deserve to be kept in the loop about that manuscript. Therefore, I look after the reviewers by sending them the other reviewer’s report, letting them know the final outcome, and sending them a reprint upon publication. We also aim to provide a forum for effective communication of advances in plant sciences, and may in future host online discussions. We offer wider media exposure through articles in magazines such as the New Scientist to highlight research with an application of interest to the general public.End of interview

Functional Plant Biology
Dr. Jennifer Henry, Managing Editor
CSIRO PUBLISHING  
Related Links:

#1 | #2
All external sites will open in a new browser. The Thomson Corporation and in-cites.com do not endorse external sites.
Functional Plant Biology's most-cited paper with 42 cites to date:
Chaves MM, Maroco JP, Pereira JS, "Understanding plant responses to drought - from genes to the whole plant," Funct. Plant Biol. 30(3): 239-64, 2003.

Source: Essential Science Indicators

  

in-cites, April 2006
Citing URL: http://www.in-cites.com/journals/FunctionalPlantBiology.html


ScienceWatch.com - Tracking Trends and Perfomance in Basic Research
Go to the new ScienceWatch.com

Home | Search | Disclaimer | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Copyright
Contact Webmaster with questions/comments |
(c) 2008 The Thomson Corporation.