|
|  |
|
in-cites,
February 2006
Citing URL: http://www.in-cites.com/journals/AgingMentalHealth.html
|
his
month, in-cites talks with Professor Martin Orrell, one of the
editors of the journal Aging & Mental Health, about
the journal’s citation record in Psychiatry &
Psychology. At present, the journal has 474 papers cited a
total of 1,361 times to date in this field, according to
Essential Science Indicators .
In January,
Aging & Mental Health had the highest percent
increase in total citations in Psychiatry & Psychology.
|
Did you expect Aging
& Mental Health to
become highly cited, or is this surprising to you?
|

“In many parts of the world, people are living longer, and this has fuelled the need for more research in gerontology and related fields.”
|
|
I set up the journal in 1995 and was lucky enough to be able to
bring together an exceptionally talented group of colleagues as the
other editors. As they were all leading lights in their fields this
enabled us to attract an international editorial board of great
renown. The other editors, Dan Blazer, Steve Zarit, Bob Woods, and
I, felt that Aging & Mental Health should be able to
establish a special place in the academic literature as it covered
both normal and abnormal aspects of aging and mental health and was
both strongly interdisciplinary in nature and biopsychosocial in its
approach. The first issue came out in 1997 and our priorities in the
first few years involved making sure that we had sufficient
innovative and high-quality papers, a growing readership, and a high
reputation. Within a few years we were indexed by ISI®
and Medline, indicating that our reputation and citation rate were
both moving in the right direction.
How would you account for the increased citation rate of
Aging & Mental Health?
We have worked hard over the years to have articles that are both
high in quality and readable, and many people have been very
complimentary about the journal. Our website has a very large number
of hits per month with many people accessing articles and abstracts
online. We have been online from the first issue, so having the
complete set of issues available electronically is a plus. In
addition, over the years our rejection rate has steadily increased
to around 60%, and our page count has increased year to year. In the
first year we had four issues of 96 pages, in 2003 we went up to
bimonthly issues, and this year our issues will be bigger than ever
at about 128 pages. This means readers can see more papers to
interest them in each issue, and being bimonthly means papers get
published faster. Also we have had a policy of promoting special
sections within issues highlighted by an editorial. This means that
relevant papers are conveniently grouped together. But because the
special section is perhaps only half of the issue (or less) readers
who are less interested in it still have a number of unrelated
articles to peruse.
Was there a change in policy or editorial direction that might account
for this?
We have meetings of the editors every couple of years and once we
were convinced that Aging & Mental Health was firmly
established as a high-quality journal, with a growing readership and
an excellent reputation, we decided that the way forward was to
continue to improve the quality, and the citation rate was a useful
benchmark for this. The publishers have always been very strongly
supportive of the journal, and we have editorial control of which
papers go in which issue, so this gives us some scope for moving
papers around into special sections, which seems to be popular with
the many researchers who like the opportunity to see a related group
of papers backed up by a thoughtful editorial. So the policy change
has been to increase the number of special sections to at least one
per issue where possible. In addition, increasing the page count is
popular with authors as it reduces the time lag to publication. We
are in the process of grouping online papers by theme to allow more
systematic searching of the journal on our website and we feel that
as this will improve ease of access to related papers so it may also
increase our citation rate.
What historical factors have contributed to the success of
Aging & Mental Health?
In many parts of the world, people are living longer, and this
has fuelled the need for more research in gerontology and related
fields. In the area of aging and mental health it has been a
particularly exciting time since there has been a growing
realization of the importance of psychosocial factors in the mental
well being of the elderly.
Have there been specific developments in the fields served by
Aging & Mental Health
that may have contributed?
There have been developments all across the field but I suppose
the greater awareness of lifestyle factors in wellbeing and mental
health in old age, and the developing understanding of the social
and psychological dimensions of dementia have been two areas of
special interest.
What, in your view, is this journal’s main significance or
contribution in the field of Psychiatry & Psychology?
It has an interdisciplinary perspective which helps researchers
and clinicians be more aware of ideas beyond their own area of
expertise. In addition the emphasis on normal as well as abnormal
aspects of aging and mental health means Aging & Mental
Health has developed a clear and recognizable identity in the
academic community.
How do you see your field(s) evolving in the next few years?
Probably along the same lines as I mentioned above. But I think
future studies will provide us with a greater understanding about
the interplay between biological, social, and psychological factors
in mental health and disease.
What role do you see for your journal?
We would like to remain in the forefront of new research in this
area.
Aging & Mental Health
Professor Martin Orrell, editor
Taylor & Francis, publishers
|
|
|
in-cites, February 2006
Citing URL: http://www.in-cites.com/journals/AgingMentalHealth.html
|
|