In
this in-cites interview, Dr.
Martin S. Flaherty discusses the Joseph R. Crowley Program
in International Human Rights at Fordham University Law School
in New York. Fordham is ranked at #156 overall among the
52,000 institutions covered in the ISI
Essential Science Indicators
Web product. In the field of Social Sciences, Fordham has 469
papers cited a total of 1,764 times to date. Dr. Flaherty’s
paper, "History right?: historical scholarship, original
understanding, and treaties as ‘supreme law of the land,’"
(Columbia Law Review 99[8]: 2095-153, December
1999) was featured with his commentary
in ESI Special Topics:
New Hot Papers
section in January
2002. Dr. Flaherty is the Co-Director of the Crowley
Program at Fordham.
|
What factors or circumstances led
your institution to its work?
The Crowley Program in
International Human Rights grew out of human rights work undertaken
both by myself and my colleague, Tracy Higgins. Tracy had gone to
Afghanistan under the auspices of the International League for Human
Rights; I had done extensive
work in Northern Ireland with the Lawyers Committee for Human Rights
and the Belfast-based Committee for the Administration of Justice.
We both thought that our law students should have the same sorts of
opportunities we had, so we set about starting a program. Fordham
Law School, where we both already taught, was a promising host for a
number of reasons. It was committed to public interest law. It was
also strong in international law. In addition, it is based in
Manhattan, home to the UN and to numerous international human rights
non-governmental organizations (NGOs).
What role did external support
and funding play in this area?
A unique aspect of the Crowley
Program is annual human rights missions to different countries
involving professors, students, and advocates from outside human
rights NGOs. The process begins when we select 6 to 8 students with
exceptional promise to go on that year's mission. Those students
then take a more general human rights survey in the fall (with 50 or
so other students), then a seminar in the spring that concentrates
on the particular nation and human rights standards relevant to that
years mission. All this culminates in a two-week mission in the late
spring that in turn forms the basis of a major human rights report
published in the Fordham International Law Journal and as a
stand-alone publication. A key aspect of this process is our
partnering with a human rights NGO for that particular year. Among
other things, the NGO's expertise complements our academic
resources. We have been extremely fortunate in our partners, which
have included: the Lawyers Committee for Human Rights (for our
mission to Turkey); the New York City Bar Association (Hong Kong);
the Mexico City-based Centro PRODH (Mexico); Women in Law and
Development in Africa (Ghana) and Human Rights Watch (this coming
year, to Malaysia). For the Ghana mission, we were also accompanied
by The Teaching & Learning Network, which is completing a
documentary on our Program to air on PBS later this year. Last but
hardly least, generous financial support from Fordham Law School
alumni and administration, especially from our Dean, John Feerick,
make all this possible.
What are the implications of your
institution's work for the future of this particular field in terms of
practical applications?
The Crowley Program's work aims to
combine rigorous academic study with practical advocacy. Our annual
mission is the most obvious way in which this occurs. In that
regard, substantial classroom work serves as preparation for an
intensive mission that results in a publication that helps publicize
the adherence to human rights norms in a given country. The Crowley
Program further seeks to combine the theoretical and practical in
other ways. Our
Advocates Program helps place students with local NGOs throughout
the US and world, especially for summer internships. These students
thus get hands-on experience in places such as Northern Ireland,
Haiti, South Africa, Central Asia, Mexico, and many others. We
further have a speakers program in which human rights advocates and
scholars can share their experiences at the Law School in programs
ranging from informal "brown bag" lunches to major talks
given by such individuals as Professor and Human Rights Committee
member Louis Henkin, UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Mary
Robinson, and South African Constitutional Court Judge Richard
Goldstone.
What are your institution's
immediate and long-term research goals?
Our immediate goals are to continue
planning for our Malaysia mission, to continue follow-up work for
the other countries we've been to, and generally to continue placing
students with NGOs. Our long-term goals include: establishing an LLM
program in human rights law for foreign students; obtaining funding
to underwrite student internship in our Advocates Program, and
expanding our academic programs.
What research fields or
capabilities do you see as critical for the future of your
institution?
Currently, our "staff"
consists of two professors and our Crowley Fellow, who is a recent
law school graduate who works with the Program for a year (our
current Fellow is Nicole Fritz, who is from South Africa and has
done substantial human rights writing and advocacy work). To
maintain our present level of activity, and certainly to expand, we
would greatly benefit from administrative support (i.e. a secretary
or assistant). More broadly, we would benefit substantially from a
greater presence of foreign scholars and advocates. Ideally, as
well, we would like to expand our own emphasis beyond traditional
civil and political rights to issues related to globalization, such
as labor and other economic and social issues. In this last regard,
we are already fortunate in having recently hired faculty who are
both interested in these issues and in taking part in our program.
What is your prediction for the
state of our knowledge about this particular field 10 years from now?
Human rights work requires a degree
of optimism. In that light, I expect and hope that human rights will
become more integrated into mainstream academics and scholarship in
the coming years. Though it has ancient roots, human rights law in
many senses is only about 50 years old in its current form. During
that time, nothing short of a conceptual revolution has occurred
that has reversed the old notion that what nations do to people
within their own borders is purely their business. Tremendous
strides have been made in creating various sets of norms and
standards through treaties and customs to hold nations accountable
for their human rights records. That said, critical challenges
remain. One is a woeful lack of enforcement of these standards.
Another is a continued lack of attention to economic and social
rights. In addition, human rights law remains
"under-theorized" to a significant extent. I expect
progress on all these fronts in the next decade.
What would you like to
convey to the general public about your institution's work?
What we are especially proud of
is that in a few short years we have been able to establish a
Program that has been innovative, has generated an immense amount of
interest among current and prospective students, and has achieved a
high degree recognition in the human rights community, both here and
abroad.
Joseph R. Crowley Program in
International Human Rights
Fordham Law School
New York, NY, USA
http://law.fordham.edu/crowley.htm
Related
Features:
Read Dr.
Martin S. Flaterty's comments in the January 2002 issue of ESI
Special Topics section: "New
Hot Papers."
View the rankings of the Columbia
Law Review, the journal in which Professor Flaherty published his
paper, in the "Journal" category within in cites.
|