|
|  |
|
in-cites,
October 2005
Citing URL: http://www.in-cites.com/institutions/LondonSchoolHygieneTropicalMed.html
|
|

 |
 |
| London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine |
 |

 |
ccording
to a recent analysis of the ISI
Essential Science Indicators Web
product, the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
has achieved the highest
percent increase in total citations in the field of
Microbiology from the first to the second bimonthly period of
2005. The School’s current citation record in this field
includes 377 papers cited a total of 5,793 times to date. The
School also has papers in the fields of Clinical Medicine,
Immunology, Social Sciences, and Plant & Animal Science.
In the interview below, Professor Brendan Wren, Professor of
Microbial Pathogenesis and Head of the Pathogen Molecular
Biology Unit in the Department of Infectious and Tropical
Diseases, talks about the School’s record, research, and
goals with regard to the field of Microbiology.
|
How do you account for the
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine's significant
increase in the number of citations in the field of Microbiology in
recent years?
Our focus is on medical microbiology relating to infectious
diseases.
There are probably three main reasons for the citation attention:
|

“The School is unique in that it is involved in the A to Z of infectious diseases—from DNA molecules to decision-making in field trials.”
|
|
1) The post-genome revolution. The availability of genome
sequences of microbes coupled with the development of
high-throughput "omics" technology has meant that rather
than looking at one gene at a time we can have a "bird’s
eye" view of them all. It is like suddenly having all the
pieces in a 3D jigsaw puzzle—now it is a question of putting all
the pieces together to really help us understand what makes them
tick. The post-genome era is a revolution in microbiology—just as
Antonie van Leeuwenhoek discovered the microscope and we had the
microscopy revolution where we could see bugs, now we have their
genetic blueprint and can really understand how they evolve and to
have the inventory of the attributes that enable them to cause
disease.
2) A better understanding of host-pathogen interactions.
Technology has allowed us to have a deeper understanding of not just
the microbe, but also how the host responds. This is giving us a
true understanding of the events taking place in the battleground of
infection.
3) There has been a public and political will to invest in
medical microbiology after several recent "bug alert
stories," particularly in the UK. Despite advances in the
treatment of infectious disease, pathogenic bacteria still represent
one of the most important threats to human health worldwide. Many
infectious disease agents have never been controlled or have
re-emerged as global pathogens, while others pose a new threat.
Media and scientific attention have focused on a range of problems,
including the alarming spread of antibiotic resistance, the threat
of bioterrorism, microbial contamination of food, the global
resurgence of tuberculosis, and other emerging and re-emerging
infections triggered by lifestyle and political, economical, and
ecological changes. Micro-organisms also have a causative role in
major diseases, such as cancer (e.g., Helicobacter pylori and
gastric cancer and Chlamydia pneumoniae and heart disease).
Therefore, the need to gain an integrated and comprehensive
understanding of the workings of our old bacterial adversaries to
allow design of effective antimicrobials and vaccines is as great as
ever.
Does this reflect a deliberate plan to enhance the university's
research effort in this field, or was this an unexpected or
serendipitous development?
Not really a deliberate plan to increase the number of staff, but
more to be strategically well placed to exploit genomics through key
appointments and improved infrastructure. In fact, due to resurgence
of microbiology, we have lost several members of the microbiology
staff who have gained chair appointments elsewhere.
However, the School has recently had the foresight to make
funding available for a chair in "Emerging Infectious
Diseases," an area of increasing importance and public concern.
Are
there specific areas of research within microbiology on which the
School particularly focuses?
Post-genome analysis of microbes to understand pathogenesis and
the evolution of virulence. There is a focus on gastrointestinal
infections, a major cause of disease worldwide, but a much-neglected
area of research.
What factors or circumstances led the School to its work in this
field?
The School is an institute dedicated to the study of infectious
diseases, particularly tropical diseases, and has always had a
strong tradition in microbiology.
What is your prediction for the state of our knowledge about this
particular field 10 years from now?
Medical microbiology will continue to be important for the next
10 years at least. We will not outwit our old adversaries overnight,
and the pipeline to successful antimicrobials and vaccines takes
many years.
In the next 10 years we will be in a stronger position to tackle
more complex microbial problems such as mixed infections and in
particular "our microbial gut microflora in health and disease
and differing nutritional status." There are 10 times more
bacterial cells in our gut than we have cells that constitute our
own makeup, yet we know so little about our gut microflora and
probably have yet to even identify 80% of the species. New
methodology such as systems biology approaches will vastly improve
our understanding of complex systems like the human microflora and
host-pathogen interactions during infection.
From the non-infectious disease perspective, microbiology will be
increasingly important in industrial processes (e.g., food
production and bioremediation).
Also more widely, the future will see major advances in molecular
parasitology (e.g., malaria) as the post-genome analysis of these
"larger genome" organisms becomes available, mirroring the
post-genome microbiology (bacteriology) revolution.
What research fields or capabilities do you see as critical for the
future of the School?
The School is unique in that it is involved in the A to Z of
infectious diseases—from DNA molecules to decision-making in field
trials. This includes disciplines ranging from molecular biology,
immunology, clinical research, epidemiology, medical trials,
statistics, field work, health economics, etc. The School needs to
maintain a balanced portfolio of research areas to continue its
international perspective and reputation in infectious diseases
research.
There will be a need to maintain and extend laboratory-based
research in the light of the post-genome revolution (not just genome
sequences of microbes, but also of man and model organisms such as
the mouse) and also to translate the basic work into practical
benefits that can be tested in trials.
What are the implications of the School's work for the future of this
particular field or neighboring fields?
The long-term implications for laboratory-based research at the
School (microbiology, virology, parasitology, immunology, etc.) will
be to translate the basic findings into tangible benefits to reduce
the burden of infectious disease worldwide.
Brendan Wren, CChem, Ph.D.
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
London, UK
| The
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicines' most-cited paper with
357 cites to date: |
|
Most-cited paper: Parkhill J,
et al., "The genome sequence of the food-borne pathogen
Campylobacter jejuni reveals hypervariable sequences,"
Nature 403(6770): 665-8 10 Feb. 2000. |
|
Source:
ISI
Essential Science Indicators |
|
|
|
|
in-cites, October 2005
Citing URL: http://www.in-cites.com/institutions/LondonSchoolHygieneTropicalMed.html
|
|